Player Year Official Ground

World Cup 2007 schedule

World Cup 2007 schedule Read The Article

Continued 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 
26  Next»

Author

Messages

rustam	hi india win world cup 2007 ( Posted: Monday , February 19, 2007 at 22:16 )
arjun	gangly uttapa next all right ( Posted: Monday , February 19, 2007 at 20:49 )
sankesh	this time australian are not going to take cup ( Posted: Monday , February 19, 2007 at 20:21 )
shish	India batting order should be: sehwag uthappa ganguly tendulkar dravid yuvi dhoni ( Posted: Monday , February 19, 2007 at 16:24 )
taj	indians should play the world cup as they are fighting in a world war from india ( Posted: Monday , February 19, 2007 at 14:00 )
Ahsan Raza	Pakistan, New Zealand, Australia, South Africa finalist for this world cup keeping in view of caribbean pitches ( Posted: Monday , February 19, 2007 at 02:17 )
varun	india plz plz continue this form in the WORLD CUP 2007... ( Posted: Sunday , February 18, 2007 at 20:42 )
imran shahzad	agar main pakistan team ka coch ya koi selection commatie main hota tu mari favorite team yeh hoti. 1.Inzimama_ul_haq(cap) 2.Younis khan(v.cap) 3.Mohammad yousaf 4.Abdul razzaq 5.Sulman butt 6.Imran nazir 7.Mohammad haffiz 8.Kamran akmal 9.Shoaib malik 10.Shahid afridi 11.Umar gull 12.Shoaib akhter 13.Mohammad asif 14.Rao iftikhar anjum 15.Abdul rehman ( Posted: Sunday , February 18, 2007 at 20:32 )
S. Arun	Continued .... The reason for this is that Aus. has come down a notch recently losing 4 in a row not defending 337 against NZ today with the bowling attack more or less the one in WC except Lee who is doubtful anyway. SA looks extremely good but Pak beat them in 1 match convincingly. Eng. is resurgent with good finds in Joyce & Plunkett plus add Pieterson. SL with Vaas & Murli will be tough and their repeated recovery after top order collapse shows their strength. Ind. is looking impressive with batsmen in good nick & bowlers doing well except at the death. Erratic Pak. can be underestimated by others at their own peril. NZ is playing well with perhaps the best all rounders in the game (M/S Oram & Vettori) adding depth. WI with Sarwan and the decent bowling attack is a force esp. at home. Yet all repeat all the teams have also looked vulnerable! So, guys lick your lips in anticipation. And hope India does have the last laugh and bring us the Cup. ( Posted: Sunday , February 18, 2007 at 18:12 )
S. Arun	I am a great supporter of the Indian cricket but I am a cricket fan first. Though I would like India to win I am really looking forward to 1&1/2 months of quality and competitive cricket. I think ICC has got the format right this time. There is no chance of a Kenya or a Bangladesh sneaking into the semis as the super 8s ensures that 2 good sides are not eliminated early. Even if one of the minnows repalce a better team in the next round they cannot get past the other 7 by the odd upset win. Not that there is much chance of any of the teams other than the 8 established sides of making it beyond round 1. The other good thing about this cup is that unlike previous editions any 4 teams could reach the semis. Previously 2 or 3 teams were already ahead of the others and almost assured of a semi-final birth while the others fought for the remaining 1 or 2 slots. But look at it this time with this format. The teams in the semis could be Aus. Ind. SA and NZ. but it is not unimaginable that it could be Eng. WI, Pak and SL ! or any other combination of 4. ( Posted: Sunday , February 18, 2007 at 18:10 )

Continued 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 
26  Next»

Your Feedback

Maximum characters allowed

Name

Email

Country

Select Country Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burma Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo (Zaire) Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia Gabon The Gambia Gaza Strip and West Bank Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti The Holy See Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Korea Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Islands Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe

Guidelines

• Do not be rude to other users/authors or disrupt an ongoing conversation/debate.
• Do not use ethnic slurs, engage in personal insults or use objectionable language.
• Criticism, when constructive and non-disruptive is always welcome.
• Comments with links in them won't be published other than in cases of rare exceptions.
• Comments that include personal details such as postal addresses and telephone numbers will not be published.
• Keep the comments relevant to the topic as much as possible.
• Do not impersonate another reader or a public figure.
• Do try to use English to write your comments.
• Comment Policy Explained

Disclaimer