vinod
Today, Dravid was playing to cement his place in the team. It was very selfish of him to play the game so slowly. As a result, India may have missed an opportunity to win this match. I wonder how BCCI can justify Dravid''s selection in T20 with his slow batting?
( Posted: Saturday , March 29, 2008 at 22:54 )
Shreepal
wtf..was he doing in the center .. if this test is a draw then only one person has to be blame..! he stood like a wall between a result and a prety obivs draw...! he kileed so much time in between inst ed of geting up the runn rate..even on 4th days morning her just scored 3 runs of 30 ballz.. he played very selfishly....! this games is getting lame now.. u play fr 5 days an end of it u dont get a reslut..Americans cal it true.."game of fools."
( Posted: Saturday , March 29, 2008 at 22:25 )
Pradeep Puri
HHe may have reached 10000 runs in the lowest amount of tests, but lets look at his record in the last few years. It was embarrasing to watch him in Australia & even yesterday. The public wants entertainment & if he has not leant that lesson, he needs to retire & enjoy his past records with his parents & children.Let the young people play or take his game to a new standard like Sachin.
( Posted: Saturday , March 29, 2008 at 20:53 )
The new version of cricket: TWENTY 20 is conceived for the entertaintment freaks/maniacs. TEST CRICKET is all about character,perseverance ,technique ,concentration etc of a cricketer and Mr wall-DRAVID is personification of all the above.And the word "TEST CRICKET"
itself implies that. Therefore those who want entertainment watch only shorter version of the game.Then ,such innings by sehwag/vivian richards/lara
happens only once in a while and let us enjoy then .
tkskumar
( Posted by
tkskumar on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 07:08 )
if dravid would have not been in crease for such long time sehwag would have not scored 300 and india would have not scored 600+ runs.can u tell the meaning of " take his game to a new standard like Sachin(duck)".
what happened to "young captain"(scored 16) and sachin(duck) ? did they provide u entertainment this match.
( Posted by
sathyanarayana on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 01:34 )
Can''t agree with you more. It is indeed embarassing to watch Dravid play slow poke. It is not only just embarassment, but he is killing any chances for victory. All he worries about is staying at the crease and making more runs for himself no matter how slow he scores. He should retire immediately and stop blocking young players.
( Posted by
CM on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 01:05 )
The new version of cricket: TWENTY 20 is conceived for the entertaintment freaks/maniacs. TEST CRICKET is all about character,perseverance ,technique ,concentration etc of a cricketer and Mr wall-DRAVID is personification of all the above.And the word "TEST CRICKET"
itself implies that. Therefore those who want entertainment watch only shorter version of the game.Then ,such innings by sehwag/vivian richards/lara
happens only once in a while and let us enjoy then .
tkskumar
( Posted by
tkskumar on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 07:08 )
if dravid would have not been in crease for such long time sehwag would have not scored 300 and india would have not scored 600+ runs.can u tell the meaning of " take his game to a new standard like Sachin(duck)".
what happened to "young captain"(scored 16) and sachin(duck) ? did they provide u entertainment this match.
( Posted by
sathyanarayana on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 01:34 )
Can''t agree with you more. It is indeed embarassing to watch Dravid play slow poke. It is not only just embarassment, but he is killing any chances for victory. All he worries about is staying at the crease and making more runs for himself no matter how slow he scores. He should retire immediately and stop blocking young players.
( Posted by
CM on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 01:05 )
C M chidanand (captain )
Dravids hundred was no use to India.It only served to beef up his averages and records.Uder the circumstances South Africans made no serious attempt to get him out. The more Dravid stayed at the crease the more he served the cause of South Africa.
( Posted: Saturday , March 29, 2008 at 20:10 )
In what way Sehwag''s 319 has helped Indians execpt for records.
( Posted by
viswanathan s on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 09:32 )
Whose 100 is important to india ? Forget dravid ... what others were doing in other end ? !! and what happened to your batting line up after dravid''s wicket?? btw what happened to your attacking batsman dhoni ?? LOL you indians.. such thankless bunch
( Posted by
Harry Davis on Saturday , March 29, 2008 at 22:16 )
In what way Sehwag''s 319 has helped Indians execpt for records.
( Posted by
viswanathan s on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 09:32 )
Whose 100 is important to india ? Forget dravid ... what others were doing in other end ? !! and what happened to your batting line up after dravid''s wicket?? btw what happened to your attacking batsman dhoni ?? LOL you indians.. such thankless bunch
( Posted by
Harry Davis on Saturday , March 29, 2008 at 22:16 )
amitabh
the sooner we see the back of dravid and gangulythe better it will be for indian cricket. they are too slow and quite often to drive home the advantage. they wre very good once upon a time but are no good to fit in the requirements of modern day cricket. today dravid was too slow and gangly failed to deliver. perhaps likes of Raina and sharma could have done a better job and who knows India could have won the match.
( Posted: Saturday , March 29, 2008 at 19:30 )
no need to go for raina,sharma
what about young captain
( Posted by
sathya on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 01:38 )
no need to go for raina,sharma
what about young captain
( Posted by
sathya on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 01:38 )
krishnamurthi
in tests Dravids batting average in tests won by india is higher than tendulkars dravidsaverage in 2nd innings is better than tendulkars dravidsaverage outside subcontinent is better than tendulkar dravidhaswon more matches than tendulkar abroad and still hedoes not get even half of the praise and adulation that tendulkar gets it is because the media and general ignorant public just do not understand his worth and confuses one dayers with tests and possibly becauseof dravids understated personality
( Posted: Saturday , March 29, 2008 at 19:04 )
arvin
and what should also be highlighted is that every run scored today to reach 10000 was by a very very selfish player who did not care a hoot for the team and his fellow players...
( Posted: Saturday , March 29, 2008 at 15:29 )
HE HAS PLAYED FOR THE TEAM AND REST OF OTHER PLAYERS TILL NOW . IF HE PLAYS ONE IN 120 MATCHES NOTHING HAPPENS TO THE RESULT.
( Posted by
ban on Saturday , March 29, 2008 at 19:18 )
how can u tell a player like rahul dravid as shelfish
he was the architect of historic win against pakisthan in pakisthan,aussies in austalia,england in england,westindies in west indies.
sourav should have won as captain , but look at the contibution of dravid in that wins.
he was invoved in hitoric win at eden gardens against aussies.
he is one of the cricketers who play for country and not for fame .
( Posted by
sathyanarayana on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 01:47 )
HE HAS PLAYED FOR THE TEAM AND REST OF OTHER PLAYERS TILL NOW . IF HE PLAYS ONE IN 120 MATCHES NOTHING HAPPENS TO THE RESULT.
( Posted by
ban on Saturday , March 29, 2008 at 19:18 )
how can u tell a player like rahul dravid as shelfish
he was the architect of historic win against pakisthan in pakisthan,aussies in austalia,england in england,westindies in west indies.
sourav should have won as captain , but look at the contibution of dravid in that wins.
he was invoved in hitoric win at eden gardens against aussies.
he is one of the cricketers who play for country and not for fame .
( Posted by
sathyanarayana on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 01:47 )
Mahesh Urs
Dear Friends, For All Your Information Mr.The Great Wall of India and for Indian Cricket & Mr.Consistency Karnataka Ciric Hero Rahul Dravid is the IInd fastest to reach 10000 runs in his 120th Test. Ist being Lara-111 test cricket. He is the Fastest Indian to reach 10.000 runs -120th test(Gavasker 124 and Tendulkar - 122 test). PLEASE HIGHLITE THIS INFORMATION IN YOUR WEBSITE AND NEWS.
( Posted: Saturday , March 29, 2008 at 13:54 )
Dear Mahesh, what matters most is the average runs per innings but not the number of tests played. Though Lara took less mathes than Dravid and Tendulkar to reach 10K mark, his avg is less than D & T. That means he played more innings than Dravid and Tend''kar in less number of tests. Hence go by the consistency rather than 400 runs in an innings and single digit figures for the next 10-15 innings. Lara is no match to Tend''kar and Dravid when it comes to consistency. Most of the runs scored by lara are of marathon innings but not of consistent performance in a back to back series and more over Lara''s record is pathetic in sub continent.
( Posted by
kishore on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 00:40 )
Dear Mahesh, what matters most is the average runs per innings but not the number of tests played. Though Lara took less mathes than Dravid and Tendulkar to reach 10K mark, his avg is less than D & T. That means he played more innings than Dravid and Tend''kar in less number of tests. Hence go by the consistency rather than 400 runs in an innings and single digit figures for the next 10-15 innings. Lara is no match to Tend''kar and Dravid when it comes to consistency. Most of the runs scored by lara are of marathon innings but not of consistent performance in a back to back series and more over Lara''s record is pathetic in sub continent.
( Posted by
kishore on Sunday , March 30, 2008 at 00:40 )