Player Year Official Ground

Indian bowlers in England

There has been always very little mentioned about the bowling contributions during the tours of England. Read The Article

Author

Messages

ramesh	I think India have to give chance to yusuf patan because he is a better all rounder than the current players who is playing now.Dhoni should not give chance to Yuvraj to bowl because its not 1day match.And about Yuvraj he has to perform well,he is having the better stamina than any one else except Sehwag.if India followed this kind of advices surely India can win the rest of the matches..COMMON INDIA we love you ( Posted: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 at 19:18 )
ramprabhu	To be frank. England really deserved to be the winners; they played well through out the series well. Fielded 100 times better than Indians. India needs to concentrate just on 4 main things 1. To field well. They gift nearly 20 to 30 runs to opponents. People like kaif and raina Provide at least 10+ before they go on to bat. So it the time that selectors give thought to little things like this. 2. India needs some good Death bowlers. We give nearly 100 to 120 runs in last 10 overs. If at all if we take early wickets, we struggle to dislodge the lower middle order, it happened win SA with Kemp and hall, now it happened in England with Shah, Wright and Dimiti. Yorkers and slow balls, nothing can be seen. 3. Indian selectors need to understand the term all-rounder; Agarkar is not an all-rounder We have many better players than him in the country. Please for God sake looks for some other real all-rounder or at least a bowler who can bat and contribute 20 runs. Pathan is a better all-rounder compared to agarkar. 4. Never look for sachin and sourav to give a 100 run stand always. Others need to chip in always such a good stand is not possible; never get overexcited with one win. ( Posted: Sunday , September 09, 2007 at 10:47 )
max john	hi, i think india should field well,nothing else that would do the rest. ( Posted: Saturday , September 08, 2007 at 13:06 )
srinath	If India has to win the final ONE DAY MATCH, throw Agarkar out. I am definately that if Agarkar is in the final match, India is going to loose. ( Posted: Friday , September 07, 2007 at 18:19 )
rajaram shanker	dear sir, the article is interesting but i would like to add-1.our bowlers are good but seem to be under the erroneous impression that they must some how take wickets-it may be right but in one day games the bowlers should bowl accurately and keep the pressure on the batsmen-it is a pity that sreesanth is left out and agarkar taken in-we can do better if zaheer returns ,and sreesanth plays instead of agarkar+in case of five bowlers, go for four fast bowlers and a spinner except where the opitch could assist spin[likeoval]best of luck-regards-rajaram ( Posted: Saturday , August 25, 2007 at 09:46 )

Your Feedback

Maximum characters allowed

Name

Email

Country

Select Country Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burma Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo (Zaire) Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia Gabon The Gambia Gaza Strip and West Bank Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti The Holy See Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Korea Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Islands Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe

Guidelines

• Do not be rude to other users/authors or disrupt an ongoing conversation/debate.
• Do not use ethnic slurs, engage in personal insults or use objectionable language.
• Criticism, when constructive and non-disruptive is always welcome.
• Comments with links in them won't be published other than in cases of rare exceptions.
• Comments that include personal details such as postal addresses and telephone numbers will not be published.
• Keep the comments relevant to the topic as much as possible.
• Do not impersonate another reader or a public figure.
• Do try to use English to write your comments.
• Comment Policy Explained

Disclaimer