Bhajji grounded but what about Sreesanth?

Harbhajan has been made an example of but Sreesanth too needs a rap on the knuckles. Read The Article

Total Comments: 105

Author

Messages

rao	OHHH! MY RAJSHEKHAR where were you gone!!!! ( Posted: Tuesday , April 29, 2008 at 02:14 )
mayank	absolutely right, i totally agree with u ( Posted: Tuesday , April 29, 2008 at 01:42 )
Jayan	I mean what is the hoopla ha about... ??? Why is media blowing this incidence out of proportion. Arguments happen, sometimes they get out of hand. When the 2 players involved in the incident have themselves got no qualms about it and have setteled the issue amongst themselves then why is media trying to play god. I do feel that the person who has written this article himself needs to think why he is getting so emotional ove the issue. There are many more things happening in the nation which need to be brought up through the media .... thiThis one certainely aint one f them ...!!!! ( Posted: Tuesday , April 29, 2008 at 00:29 )
abhinandan	Unfortunately Bhajji has become a tool for settling old scores between Wadias and the Ambanis . My request is to the owners of Punjab and Mumbai teams that don''t settle your old feuds through national heroes .Please spare cricket. ( Posted: Tuesday , April 29, 2008 at 00:12 )
Rajeshkumar	Harbhajan''s ban is a positive move from BCCI. I think Sreesanth must also be banned for at least a few matches. He has already received tons and tons of warnings and it did not change his character in any way. Also, the way in which he cried proved that he is not a sportsman. ( Posted: Monday , April 28, 2008 at 23:47 )
Anonymous	Since this event does not happened during the match, and after this incident both players did not wanted to file any complain. BCCI/IPL should have ignore this for time being, and given them punishment by not selecting for couple of years. This way atleast BCCI would have become joker in front of Australian about handling their own players. IPL want to set an example to other players at the cost of reputation of BCCI for handling players. What a shame. First of all whatever we are seeing is not a gentlemen game, its all about who will hit more sixes, who got more cheerleaders, who got more money to pay. Instead of watching movie, you are watching some circus for three hours. This IPL should fail, it is not good for any form cricket. ( Posted: Monday , April 28, 2008 at 22:36 )
Sunanda Khosla	Oh please. After the down under Bhajji-Symonds faceoff, Bhajji and Symonds became two of the most sought after and highest paid players for IPL. all publicity is good publicity. Over-reaction helps. Possibly after this, the brand value of these two players would rise even further. ( Posted: Monday , April 28, 2008 at 20:29 )
Kriti	A very nice column. Like the author said in an earlier column, Sreesanth is turning out to be an embarrassment. ( Posted: Monday , April 28, 2008 at 20:22 )
Sukhwinder	Sreesanth had done his bit on the ground and that is why Sreesanth got it from Bhajji, who would not hit him without any reason. ( Posted: Monday , April 28, 2008 at 20:16 )
So you mean to say that he has the right to do that.If Sreesanth has done something wrong the official''s should take care of it.The ban is justified. I very well understand your sentiments towards Harbhajan,but he had to get it. ( Posted by Dilip on Tuesday , April 29, 2008 at 05:06 )
Sunil G Desai	I think this whole issue is blown out of proportion. I would say this incident did not occur while the game was on and only when it was all over this happened. so it has nothing to do with the rules of the game. If a player fights with someone after the match it''s their own choice and it has nothing to do with IPL or BCCI. Both the players are known short tampered type and it''s really cruel if one is punished for no reason and other is not even reprimanded. Take the case of world cup finals. Zinedine was slapped life time ban cause it was during the match but the italian player was also censured by all. Our people are too much. They are not able to digest the popularity of Harbhajan and in name of discipline they have taken a sadistic way to stop him. This guys in IPL are taking themselves as the GOD of the modern cricket and they want to teach lesson to everyone crossing their road. What a shame!!!!!! ( Posted: Monday , April 28, 2008 at 20:11 )
Blown out of all proportion? What nonsense is this? You believe in violence? As a centrally contracted and therefore an international player, Harbhajan has obligations and one is to behave as would a role model. He hasn''t done this and deserved the punishment. You Sunil S Desai, would have others believe Indians condone this sort of violence and behaviour. Shame on you. Really, shame on you. This has all to do with the laws and spirit of the game, and whatever our opionions are of the IPL and BCCI, they have acted correctly. But you would have people believe it was nothing. It explains where your thinking comes from. ( Posted by Vikram Rahul Amge on Monday , April 28, 2008 at 21:23 )   Blown out of all proportion? What nonsense is this? You believe in violence? As a centrally contracted and therefore an international player, Harbhajan has obligations and one is to behave as would a role model. He hasn''t done this and deserved the punishment. You Sunil S Desai, would have others believe Indians condone this sort of violence and behaviour. Shame on you. Really, shame on you. This has all to do with the laws and spirit of the game, and whatever our opionions are of the IPL and BCCI, they have acted correctly. But you would have people believe it was nothing. It explains where your thinking comes from. ( Posted by Vikram Rahul Amge on Monday , April 28, 2008 at 21:23 )

Continued 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next»

Your Feedback

Maximum characters allowed

Name

Email

Country

Select Country Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burma Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo (Zaire) Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia Gabon The Gambia Gaza Strip and West Bank Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti The Holy See Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Korea Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Islands Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe

Guidelines

• Do not be rude to other users/authors or disrupt an ongoing conversation/debate.
• Do not use ethnic slurs, engage in personal insults or use objectionable language.
• Criticism, when constructive and non-disruptive is always welcome.
• Comments with links in them won't be published other than in cases of rare exceptions.
• Comments that include personal details such as postal addresses and telephone numbers will not be published.
• Keep the comments relevant to the topic as much as possible.
• Do not impersonate another reader or a public figure.
• Do try to use English to write your comments.
• Comment Policy Explained

Disclaimer