Asian teams on coach hunt

Why it is that Australian and English, even Kiwi administrators are ahead of the rest? Read The Article

Author

Messages

rakesh	We can not solve any problem by being stupid and emotional.First step in improving anything is the WILL(which i think is not that strong).Second just keeping things simple.In the computer age it is also hardest thing.Nothing will improve by writing here and on anyother website.I think board is the real problem.Untill that is replaced by a professional body nothing can be improved .No coach no amount of money can improve our cricket.it will stay the same way. Fans should avoid cricket as much as they can.Mkae BCCi bankrupt . ( Posted: Saturday , May 12, 2007 at 22:44 )
Ray	Not sure where I read this, but someone compared the BCCI to a jet-propelled bullock cart. With all the money coming in and the way they work staying the same, that is quite apt. ( Posted: Friday , May 11, 2007 at 16:10 )
abishek	let mrchesterfield comment on who shud b next coach for india??? let him tell who shud b the next coach for india... crticism is so easy isn''t it!!!! to take constructive steps yes some time is needed... and plz dont tlk of australia again...i agree aussies are world beaters so any coach will b suitable to them.. but tatz not the case here....india is completely diff to aus in every sense..time will b taken to find a decent coach and i dont mind it unless they come up with a gud coach based on parameters... ( Posted: Friday , May 11, 2007 at 16:05 )
Shekar	Trev, i agree BCCI is not exactly a great example to learn cricket administration from. However, is it just me that feels there is absolutely nothing wrong in the BCCI sending Ravi to Dhaka to speak with Dav about the India job? Ravi is definetly capable of managing this team long term, but he is not keen and BCCI thinks he can convince Dav to take up the job. I believe Dav will be a great coach for the Indian team, he knows this part of the world and he has a proven track record. I guess for once, BCCI is doing a good thing. ( Posted: Friday , May 11, 2007 at 12:30 )
harjit	See another foreigner telling us what is wrong with us and again hitting the nail on the head. We did not listen to Chappell, but now we need to listen to this voice of sanity. Why do we continue doing things in our own unique way. Time that we changed so that we are more effective in the world of cricket. ( Posted: Friday , May 11, 2007 at 12:09 )
soham	The BCCI is more concerned abt minting money and cuting players to size .The game has survived in india despite BCCI .If BCCI continues with its comic ways of handling cricket, policy of pitting one player against another and other sinister methods cricket in this country will die.It has already taken its first steps towards that scenario. ( Posted: Thursday , May 10, 2007 at 17:42 )
Anand	We cannot expect BCCI to be organised like the rest of counter parts in cricket.BCCI is more involved in ens fire fighting and saving there back, where will they have time for cricketing issues. All four boards in Sub Contienent can get the prize for the most unorganised baord. ( Posted: Thursday , May 10, 2007 at 13:05 )
Kamal Chawla	as an Indian I feel very bad reading this article. but this is the truth and very true picture. This is why we are not world beaters. You may replace players as many times as you want .. you may find another Tendulkar but they will not succeed unless you have concrete plans ... Lets hope money this time buys the best candidate available... and we begin to beat other teams consistently even if dont win WC. ( Posted: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 at 22:20 )
BADA	Spot on Trev. The Hitlers at the BCCI are too caught up with counting the loot to plan properly about the team. The whole lot of the clowns should be shown the door. But it wont happen because there is no real spine in Indian cricket or politics for that matter....just talk ( Posted: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 at 19:49 )

Your Feedback

Maximum characters allowed

Name

Email

Country

Select Country Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burma Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo (Zaire) Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia Gabon The Gambia Gaza Strip and West Bank Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti The Holy See Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Korea Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Islands Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe

Guidelines

• Do not be rude to other users/authors or disrupt an ongoing conversation/debate.
• Do not use ethnic slurs, engage in personal insults or use objectionable language.
• Criticism, when constructive and non-disruptive is always welcome.
• Comments with links in them won't be published other than in cases of rare exceptions.
• Comments that include personal details such as postal addresses and telephone numbers will not be published.
• Keep the comments relevant to the topic as much as possible.
• Do not impersonate another reader or a public figure.
• Do try to use English to write your comments.
• Comment Policy Explained

Disclaimer