How Mandela criticism hit Zimbabwe's case
In the end it was a complete farce. And frankly, anyone who believes that Zimbabwe voluntarily withdrew from next year's T20 World Cup in England as a magnanimous gesture for the sake of 'unity' also believes in the Tooth Fairy.
Perhaps Peter Chingoka and his sidekick chief executive Ozias Bvute believe in the 18th century French myth as well. Now, with their full International Cricket Council status secure as well, they'll be able to give their "Uncle Bob" an US$10.5-million gift in time for a shopping spree in Malaysia.
Well, that is about size of the moolah package that Zimbabwe Cricket will allegedly receive to 'develop' the game in their country.
There was so much political doublespeak over the Zimbabwe issue aftermath that by the time they made the announcement in Dubai, the world's so-called senior administrators created a problem with which they are going to need to live.
Just as well, though the Asian nations took a hard look at the question when they were faced with a double challenge as Zimbabwe faced confrontation from an unexpected, if forcefully erudite source.
Cricket South Africa president Norman Arendse may have bumped a few heads and egos since he has taken over from Ray Mali. But there has been no doubt about his sincerity and in a sense his own background has shaped his administrative career and the plight of the disadvantaged.
While not quiet a maverick, Arendse tackled Chingoka in such a fashion, the cutesy term African brotherhood was placed in the dock. It needed a forthright African to challenge an African.
He and Giles Clark, the new ECB chairman asked some pointed questions about how many cricketers were killed during the build up to the June 27 presidential voting exercise that has been exposed as a sham. They were questions Chingoka was not prepared to answer.
What an embarrassment, too for the Asian nations in Dubai to be confronted with Nelson Mandela's own criticism of Zimbabwe and Mugabe was used to highlight the depth to which he accused Zimbabwe of sliding.
After a long silence, the man who endured twenty-seven years of inhuman incarceration for his opposition to the horrendous apartheid laws finally broke his silence over Mugabe and his rule.
It is known how this iconic statesman has long been deeply troubled by events in Zimbabwe which has sent three million refugees fleeing to neighbouring territories.
We watch with sadness the continuing tragedy in Darfur. Nearer to home we had seen the outbreak of violence against fellow Africans in our own country and the tragic failure of leadership in our neighbouring Zimbabwe, Mandela said.
This statement, made at a dinner to honour the African icon and his 46664 (Robben Island cell number) concert for HIV/Aids, was attended by Bill Clinton as well as Gordon Brown was of course banned in Zimbabwe, but highlighted in the South African as well as the 'dreadfully biased British' media.
Yet somehow, all this escaped the attention of the big four Asian countries before Arendse, to drive home a point at ICC meeting, tore the façade off the Zimbabwe bluff. Suddenly, as a South African source said, they were left facing a new challenge they didn't know how to handle.




Total Comments: 3
Read Comment | Post Comment
Posted : By Nqaba
Mandela had good reasons not to get involved until there is a need tp say something important. But your attack on Mandela is uncalled for as this elder statesman put up with more indignities than most on a prison island. Anyway, you have missed the thrust of Trevor Chesterfield''s fine article.to vMandela believed in healing the nation, not antagonising it as Mugabe did after losing the vote in 2002 and even when the one-party state rule proposal was rejected in the Matabeleland in 1985 when Mandela was still incarerated and which you have ignored.By 1994 Mandela had a larger project in hand in dealing with South Africa not worry about other countries.Again the writer was using Mandela''s comments as a point in the story and one where he was accusing Asian cricket administrators knew not of these comments in trying to protect Zimbabwe full ICC membership.As part of the team management in one of the South African provincial teams that played in Harare last year in this bilateral scheme, I was shocked at treatment of your own players outside the venue and their harrassment by so-called ''veterans'' accusing them of spreading lies about Zimbabwe in team dressingrooms.
Reply to this Comment
Posted : By Masendeke Musanhu
I think when it comes to the Zimbabwean issue you may be wrong on Mandela. Being a Zimbabwean, I wonder why it has taken Mandela 8 years to speak out on the Zimbabwe crisis. Also when he condemns, he does so in the UK. Was he pressurized. As far as I''m concerned Mandela just like Mbeki sympathises with Mugabe. He like Mbeki sees the Zimbabwe issue as a Britain-Zimbabwe conflict. I know the fellow is old and respected world-wide but I''m disappointed in his and South African handling of the Zimbabwe problem. Even Mugabe in his iconic days would have spoken long ago like he used to do in the days of the Nigerian military dictatorship.
Reply to this Comment
Posted : By John Dzinoreva
You hit the nail on the head bro. It is heartening to hear that there are people like you who understand the ploitics of Zimbabwe. And like you said, Nurenberg might be very far but we intend to take Mugabe and his cabal there. people must forget about talks if what they want is power sharing. Talks must not be about who should be in the seat: Mugabe or Tsvangirai. This is not about personalities. Talks must be about affording the people of Zimbabwe free choice of their leaders. People can not be held to ransome by threats of going back to the bush. All we want is the freedom to choose. We do not want to be punished for our choice.I also urge Tsvangirai not to get into power through such deals. Because if he does, there is a 99% chance that he will turn out to be onother Mugabe and refuse to get out of powewr until a deal is cut for him. NO! NO! NO! We are tired of power-hungry dictators. The internationl must interfere, even militarily, in the internal affairs of any country when the people of that country are not given freedom to choose. Its unfortunate Mugabe''s illegitimate regime still gets the millions from the International Cricket Body. Hooray to the South Africans
Reply to this Comment