• For latest updates on mobile SMS CRI to 52622

C. Rajshekhar Rao is the Editor of Cricketnext.com. A sports journalist since the early 1990s, he has covered cricket extensively at the domestic and international levels. Assignments have included matches of the 1996 World Cup on the sub-continent and the Twenty20 World Championship in South Africa in 2007.

More Columns

Archives

Procter bowled off the wrong foot

Mike Procter has defended his decision to ban Harbhajan Singh without actually being able to justify it with the statements he made to the press. In fact, it has now become all the more clear that he backed his instinct rather than any conclusive evidence.

What the former South African all-rounder is forgetting is that members of the team alleging a racial slur are themselves the witnesses in the case, which goes against the basic principles of justice.

He claimed that it was not a matter of the Aussies’ word over the Indians’, but that is what it turns out to be, for Sachin Tendulkar was as much a witness as Matthew Hayden and Michael Clarke.

Procter, a superb all-rounder who could not show his prowess much at the international level because his team was out of international cricket due to apartheid, has also claimed that he knows what racism is all about because he hails from South Africa.

Procter, who is remembered as a brave cricketer for his majestic batting, fiery pace bowling and agile fielding, has been bold this time around too in his role as an official, but definitely not just.

The 61-year-old, who was known to bowl almost on the wrong foot with his left foot in the air at the point of delivery, planted his foot firmly at Sydney, deciding to give the benefit of doubt to the accuser.

The Indian cricket Board is very right to have raked up the points to be noted during the process and it is not just the ban that matters here but the fact that a player will have to live with the stigma of being a racist and that too one hailing from a country that has detested racism down the years.

In fact, it would have been a shame had not the BCCI gone the full hog in backing its team both in the racial slur episode as well as for the poor umpiring during the Sydney Test.

A cricket Board that used all possible means to hurt the rebel Indian Cricket League, including pulling strings to deny some Kiwi cricketers roles in a Bollywood flick, certainly needed to go a step further in this issue.

Procter, who played only seven Test matches but had several achievements in first-class and list A matches, including once hitting centuries in six consecutive innings and bagging four hat-tricks during his long career, will not have much to be proud of in his stint as match referee in this series. Just like Bucknor and Mark Benson would much rather forget the Sydney Test.

Total Comments: 51

Posted : By arun

India should ban all Ausstralians players for IPL league .Lets hit them at thier Wallet which Will hurt them the most.Symonds/Ponting/Clarke/Hayden are not welcome here

Reply to this Comment

Posted : By Rajesh Malhotra

Ian Chappel commented during the "scrap" between Bhajji & Symonds - It normally happens when someone is scoring runs - and at the moment Bhajji is scoring runs ( 50+ ) so you can guess who started it.The Aussies have always tried to "eliminate" good opposition- Examplei. Called Murali for chuckingii Reported Bhajji for chuckingiii. Called Shoaib Akhtar for chuckingiv. Bully umpires & try to get players "banned" legallyWhen others complain they side step the issue & say this is the way we play - we play hard but fair - that comment always comes after an unfair act.Kumble & India should behave like the Aussies - just complain after any sledging

Reply to this Comment

Posted : By Murali

As per the television replay, the argument between bhajji and sym as gone for few minutes. But, except that one word nothing else was reported. More over it''s Sym, talking most.

Reply to this Comment

Posted : By aman

well matt you may be right in wat u r saying...but the rules state that for the accused to be termed guilty either the umpires should have heard the comment or it shud have been caught on camera...and given neither of that happened,it was wrong to ban bhajji...it certainly is an after affect of wat happened to symmonds in india which is highly regrettable...but there were hardly 20, 30 people who are cause of trouble in a crowd of thousands...and such incident has happened for the first time in india,but has happened many times in australia...

Reply to this Comment

Posted : By Aditya Mookerjee

If there is an altercation, on the cricket pitch, where both parties have exchanged hot words, and if one complains of racist abuse, what does the Match Referee do? Both Harbhajan, and Symonds are to blame for the altercation. The Australian team must not conduct itself in a manner, which normally will provoke aggressively their opponents, not just in regard to their cricketing skills. I believe, all the cricket boards must make an appeal to both the ACB, and the ICC, so that a positive and benign relationship is maintained between opposing teams.

Reply to this Comment

Feedback Form

Your Feedback

Name

Email

All the content posted in CricketNext.com Blogs section, unless specified otherwise, are made by CricketNext employees. The content posted in on CricketNext blog does not follow routine internal CricketNext reviews and editorial processes and should be considered only as the views and opinions of the writers themselves.