Player Year Official Ground

Of Rahul and Sourav

Partnership between Rahul Dravid and Sourav Ganguly when India were 6 for 2 was one of the highlights of the series Read The Blog

Continued 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  Next»

Author

Messages

surya	"THE CHAPPELL CONSPIRACY" IT IS A FACT......BECAUSE INDIA WERE IN FINALS OF 2003 WORLD CUP...THE CRICKET AUSTRALIA MANAGEMENT DID CONSULT AND REQUESTED GREG CHAPPELL TO DESTROY THE INDIAN CRICKET BY THE TIME OF 2007 WORLD CUP...AND HE SUCCEEDED BY DOING SO. CRICKET AUSTRALIA NEVER WANT INDIA IN THE FINALS AGAIN....THEY FEAR THE BATTING LINEUP OF US...SO THEY SENT GREG CHAPPELL TO DESTROY US... CHAPPELL, THE CULPRIT, SEND HIM BACK TO AUSTRALIA IN PIECES.... ( Posted: Tuesday , January 09, 2007 at 08:23 )
RG	I agree with you that the commentator you are referring to has got too big for his boots. He should be reminded that he has not played cricket at any level and verbal calistenics are not enough to be a good critic.He is no one compared to Saurav Ganguly or Zaheer Khan. I disagree with you completely that Ganguly should not lead. He is a born leader and should lead the team. The last match was lost just because of poor captaincy. Dravid is allowing umpires, officials and opposing players dictate proceedings. Lastly go and brush up your English. Learn how to write a proper article. Your ideas are good but you put them across in such unprofessional manner which makes worse reading than reading a sixth graders essay. ( Posted: Tuesday , January 09, 2007 at 08:10 )
Perfection	Amateurish Jha Why did he start he own site ? WAs Jha good enough for a top newspaper ? Answer is NO. He constantly critisizes Tendulkar And Chappel ecause he is jealous He is a die hard fan of ganguly who cant face the bouncer He only writres controversial columns to get ATTENTION A journalist shoudl write the truth and let the reader make his decision. Here what he does is write a columsn the moment india lost so that lot of ppl agree with him He has resoretd to these tatctics got sa long time because he knows that being cheap he will get hits on his website leading to revenues. He enevr held a bat in his hand and goes on to criticise shastri gavaskar etc. He kisses sourav ganguly a$$ ans sehwag a$$ non stop. Sanjay Jha is nothing but a ganguly a$$ kisser !!! ( Posted: Tuesday , January 09, 2007 at 06:21 )
Ram	Good article Mr Jha. You are absoultely right. Dravid Saurav and Sachin combination is a once in a life time combination and we should use that very wisely in the WC. Dravid has to be the designated as the captain for the world cup and there should be no deliberations about that. Ganguly has his chance and he made us proud with his captaincy. I guess in your article you are referring to Harsha Bhogle''s article in the Indian Express. He has not mentioned Zaheer or Saurav playing well in South Africa at all in his article. The team for the WC has to be a blend of old and youth. We need young guns to learn how to play under pressure which is very important and they can learn that from the trio who have a boat load of experience. ( Posted: Tuesday , January 09, 2007 at 05:57 )
parochial	Jhakas from jha !! sanjay possibly you are one of the most sensible cricket writers to whom cricket still is imp. ( Posted: Monday , January 08, 2007 at 23:53 )
Buddhadev	Thank you, Mr. Jha, for one of the most intelligent and foresightful articles on Indian cricket. Like yourself, I too was dismayed at first when I read the piece you refered to in your commentary. However, another browse through the article gave away the secret. The thesis of the said column was how "youth" was the perfect antidote to the Indian cricket malaise; so, naming two "not-so-young" cricketers would have probably marred his thesis. The columnist was likely not willing to dilute his thesis with a contradiction. We can argue against his thesis, but that would be futile at this stage. The point has been made already, hasn''t it? Cheers. ( Posted: Monday , January 08, 2007 at 22:57 )
shridhar	Very Well written. The media and the cricket experts(??) for some unexplicable reason have always treated Saurav Ganguly very shabbily. Its really good to see that atleast one columnist had the courage to stand by Ganguly in his rough days. Good show Sanjay. ( Posted: Monday , January 08, 2007 at 21:49 )
sid	What a column! This has to the best of all written by Jha! ( Posted: Monday , January 08, 2007 at 21:34 )
narender ramanan	now back to kiran more ..i havent seen such a selfish and selfcentred guy...who is cruel and does not have an iots of self respect and decency... in timesnow intrv he rattled like a repaird radio.."" .sourav played well but he should have won the matc for india..u know..rahul played well .u know ...sachin is to b blamed for losses u know...w should bring in youngsters like raina ..u know...if i was selectr i wouldnt have kept sourav u know...laxman fielding was poor u know...u kknow ..u know u know ..u know..u know... well i nwonder what he knows.. u know?...he said i wont allow sourav in team forever..now he crows saurav was playing well u know.. mebbe "u know" he was rewarded by sharad pawar for commending effort "u know!!" ..result was obvious u know...india lost 6 series u nkow..all the youngster failed u know!!!..LOL he a kiran MORON u know!!! hillarious!! ( Posted: Monday , January 08, 2007 at 21:22 )
You know i''m a moron . You know i''m a stooge you know you know .. hahahahahahahahah you know ( Posted by kiran more on Monday , January 08, 2007 at 23:49 )   Narendar -- those who would still seek cricketing intelligence from the No-MORE are destined to receive what they deserve. It is best to ignore him and trash him to the dustbin of Indian cricketing history. Unfortunately, (for Mr. More) a shabby job at the helm of the selection Committee would mar his otherwise decent stint at keeping the wickets. ( Posted by Buddhadev on Monday , January 08, 2007 at 23:07 )   You know i''m a moron . You know i''m a stooge you know you know .. hahahahahahahahah you know ( Posted by kiran more on Monday , January 08, 2007 at 23:49 )   Narendar -- those who would still seek cricketing intelligence from the No-MORE are destined to receive what they deserve. It is best to ignore him and trash him to the dustbin of Indian cricketing history. Unfortunately, (for Mr. More) a shabby job at the helm of the selection Committee would mar his otherwise decent stint at keeping the wickets. ( Posted by Buddhadev on Monday , January 08, 2007 at 23:07 )
Sreekanth	I think u have made a good point..you are being ridiculed for supporting the Bengal Tiger..i think the whole team put togather will never have the hunger and passion as Sourav alone..and i still dont realize why people are bashing Sourav? What more has he to prove?Dravid is a decent player...never was and never will be a match winner..he is an incredibly tame and unimaginitive..look where the team has come since the last World Cup finals! ( Posted: Monday , January 08, 2007 at 21:19 )
Sreekanth, We all like Ganguly both as a player and as a leader. There are very few indian former players like Shastri (a low profile player) who caused all the damage to Gangulys reputation. Ganguly was a victim of dirty indian politics. That bastard More was the main culprit. I completely agree with you. Ganguly has the hunger and passion for cricket. ( Posted by satish on Tuesday , January 09, 2007 at 12:29 )   Sreekanth, We all like Ganguly both as a player and as a leader. There are very few indian former players like Shastri (a low profile player) who caused all the damage to Gangulys reputation. Ganguly was a victim of dirty indian politics. That bastard More was the main culprit. I completely agree with you. Ganguly has the hunger and passion for cricket. ( Posted by satish on Tuesday , January 09, 2007 at 12:29 )

Continued 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  Next»

Your Feedback

Maximum characters allowed

Name

Email

Country

Select Country Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burma Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo (Zaire) Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia Gabon The Gambia Gaza Strip and West Bank Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti The Holy See Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Korea Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Islands Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe

Guidelines

• Do not be rude to other users/authors or disrupt an ongoing conversation/debate.
• Do not use ethnic slurs, engage in personal insults or use objectionable language.
• Criticism, when constructive and non-disruptive is always welcome.
• Comments with links in them won't be published other than in cases of rare exceptions.
• Comments that include personal details such as postal addresses and telephone numbers will not be published.
• Keep the comments relevant to the topic as much as possible.
• Do not impersonate another reader or a public figure.
• Do try to use English to write your comments.
• Comment Policy Explained

Disclaimer