Player Year Official Ground

BCCI's teargate scandal!

Read The Blog

Continued 1 2 3 4 5 6  Next»

Author

Messages

vik	I am not sure if you have a personal thing against Sachin , Sanjay.Sachin had to speak up in Australia because he was the only Indian apart from Harbhajan who was present in the zone of action.Here, Sachin wasn''t even playing and far from being present at the point the incident took place.Moreover, BCCI did issue a gag on the players and umpires following the incident.So I don''t see how you could blame Sachin for any of this Sanjay. ( Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 20:20 )
krishna	do u have sense.sachin is a legend.are u having 0.00000000000000000001 fame of him.keep ur mouth shut. ( Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 18:21 )
samir	The Dynamic world of cricket needs to take a holistic view It is important to put into perspective the induction of city based leagues to the world of cricket.It started with the ICL followed up by the IPL. There is an expected change in order in the way cricket is viewed and consumed by you the consumers. The Challenge for both the leagues is the same the IPL needs a window on the international calendar while the ICL needs the same in the Indian calendar. In the hype surrounding the IPL the true patrons of the game need to understand that the importance of ICL is not forgotten; as after all it has been chosen as a platform by some very promising domestic talents whose opportunity has been curbed by an unfair ban. I think Dhoni , Ganguly , Dravid Kumble and Sachin have seen the ills of domestic cricket so far . I think they should come out in support of their young colleagues who have chosen the vibrant & transparent platform of the ICL How can messiahs of globalization of sports marketing practice restrictive policies with ICL Players. ( Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 17:14 )
Sai	Sachin did not cooment because BCCI warned players not to comment on this to the Media. I am eageraly awaiting Mr. Jha''s scholarly analysis of Sourav Ganguly''s performance as a batsman in the tournament so far.. ( Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 13:34 )
Hemanth	as usual like any other column from mr.Jha - this one lacks meaning. BCCI backed Harbhajan because there was no proof against him and sachin came to his rescue for the same reason. why the hell do you go after Sachin all the time?, this is ridiculous. I remember you writing that Sachin will play IPL irrespective of whether he is fit or not. he has not played 4 IPL matches, if he is so mad after money - he would have feigned injury and played the matches. other than writing unsubstantiated arguments - you should also learn to take responsibility to your words. Sachin saved him also because he was at the non-striker''s end on the field, it is not so in this case. why do you hold so much of grudge against the master?, is it jealousy ?- but you are too small a guy to be jealous about such icon. come on dude- give it a break, your criticism of sachin has reached ridiculous proportions. don''t make a joke of yourself. even sober critics like me also are forced to vehemently criticize your columns just because of your worthless columns. ( Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 10:25 )
wellwisher	Dhoni is lucky that he has been performing well if not I can gurantee with 200% certainity that Mr Jha will start performing a post mortem of every failure of Dhoni, why, just because he dropped useless players (e.g.: Sourav Ganguly) from the ODI team. Am I write, Mr Jha. ( Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 04:30 )
wellwisher	The harsh reality, that Mr Jha cannot swallow, is that cricketnext exists today because of IPL and BCCI. Look at the way he puts both IPL and BCCI down. If you really cannot stand IPL then dont follow it. But no, you cant do that,rather wont in that case your website will go down faster than your receding hairline (pun intended). Also, one needs to keep his hand where ones mouth is, that Mr Jha makes sure that he punches a huge hole into the same plate (IPL, BCCI, Sachin Tendulkar,etc etc) that feeds not just him but all the employees of this website. There is ethical journalism and then there is Mr. Sanjay Jha. ( Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 04:27 )
Correction: There is ethical journalism then thre is daylight and then there is Mr. Sanjay Jha. ( Posted by Nitin on Sunday , May 04, 2008 at 11:34 )
raju	worst article i have read in a long time. It is author;s arrogance all the way. Poor piece of journalism. ( Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 04:16 )
Sony Joy	dude.. why to bring sachin....into this...since he is out of action, u wanna him in action lol..... ( Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 02:11 )
Mohit	ha ha ha...can''t stop laughing.. Y sachin is coming into picture? last time sachin was with bhajji and he was sure and this time he was not even on the ground.. what a senseless writter he is!!!looks like he is looking for a reason to criticize sachin.. ( Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 00:31 )

Continued 1 2 3 4 5 6  Next»

Your Feedback

Maximum characters allowed

Name

Email

Country

Select Country Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burma Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo (Zaire) Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia Gabon The Gambia Gaza Strip and West Bank Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti The Holy See Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Korea Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Islands Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe

Guidelines

• Do not be rude to other users/authors or disrupt an ongoing conversation/debate.
• Do not use ethnic slurs, engage in personal insults or use objectionable language.
• Criticism, when constructive and non-disruptive is always welcome.
• Comments with links in them won't be published other than in cases of rare exceptions.
• Comments that include personal details such as postal addresses and telephone numbers will not be published.
• Keep the comments relevant to the topic as much as possible.
• Do not impersonate another reader or a public figure.
• Do try to use English to write your comments.
• Comment Policy Explained

Disclaimer