• For latest updates on mobile SMS CRI to 52622

Deba Prasad Dhar

Deba Prasad Dhar

Content

Had ICC legitimised beamers, Deba would have probably opened the bowling for India. Claims that unlike Sir Len Hutton, he has never got out Obstructing the Field. Fortunately for the game, there were no takers for his argument. Finally, he chose the pen to vent his spleen at the establishment, and till to date the BCCI continues to present him scores of opportunities. After spending the better part of his youth in a plastic company and plugging away mindlessly at the computer, he has found his true metier in sports writing.

Archives

Tail bite

Posted Tuesday , May 22, 2007 19:11

India couldn’t have penned a better script on the penultimate day of the Chittagong Test. Then followed the ineluctable part of Indian cricket’s tragedy: the old hoodoo of the tail. Forget about the time lost owing to rain. Could India have still pulled it off? When in doubt, go to Sachin Tendulkar. The present Indian captain’s predecessors used this as a maha mantra. And the little master hardly let them down. Yes, times and changed. The nimbus around him may have faded briefly, or perhaps....

Posted by Deba Prasad Dhar at | 2 comments

The slurred grip

Posted Thursday , May 10, 2007 18:18

It’s the lesser players that flout the unwritten rules. With the incredible eyesight that Adam Gilchrist has, he can wield a reed pipe. Yet, the debate on Gilchrist’s use of squash ball in his batting gloves has hit a high octave. Sri Lankans will find it difficult to fault their Cricket secretary Kangadaran Mathivanan who has been shouting himself hoarse over the matter. There may be a scientific ground to validate his protest. If a compressed squash ball stores energy similar to that in a spring and....

Posted by Deba Prasad Dhar at | 2 comments

All the content posted in CricketNext.com Blogs section, unless specified otherwise, are made by CricketNext employees. The content posted in on CricketNext blog does not follow routine internal CricketNext reviews and editorial processes and should be considered only as the views and opinions of the writers themselves.